<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Walters &#187; Software Patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccwalters.com/category/software-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccwalters.com</link>
	<description>just me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brad Feld&#8217;s &#8220;Do Patents Slow Down Innovation?&#8221; &#8211; with comments</title>
		<link>http://ccwalters.com/2010/01/brad-felds-do-patents-slow-down-innovation-with-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://ccwalters.com/2010/01/brad-felds-do-patents-slow-down-innovation-with-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Feld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccwalters.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided to re-post Brad Feld&#8217;s latest blog along with a few personal experiences to support his topic. Speaking with Entrepreneurs every week who are worried if their product will ‘infringe’ on someone’s patent.  Better yet they wonder if all or part of their application has to be patentable in order to receive funding.  Most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to re-post Brad Feld&#8217;s <a href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/01/do-patents-slow-down-innovation.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FeldThoughts+%28Feld+Thoughts%29" target="_blank">latest blog</a> along with a few personal experiences to support his topic.</p>
<p>Speaking with Entrepreneurs every week who are worried if their product will ‘infringe’ on someone’s patent.  Better yet they wonder if all or part of their application <em>has </em>to be patentable in order to receive funding.  Most don’t have the money to find out either way.</p>
<p>I agree with Brad that software patents slow down innovation.  Most entrepreneurs can’t afford to pay the ‘vig’ (explained below) so they soldier on and pray they don’t get noticed by the patent police.  Some soldier on and hope they can grow large enough before they get noticed&#8230; oh wait, isn’t that a legal strategy?</p>
<p><strong>Example 1</strong>: Spoke with an entrepreneur who was interviewed by litigators just to see if they were large enough to bring suit. Good for them, they were found unworthy.  It makes me wondered what happens then, does the entrepreneur get placed on the &#8216;<em>patient no fly list</em>&#8216; in case they fly above a certain value, or better yet board an unexpecting company willing to purchase?</p>
<p><strong>Example 2</strong>: How about the entrepreneur who get&#8217;s a letter staing he&#8217;s infringing on a patient, then finds out his patient was filed 3 months before. I here the saying, &#8220;<em>Patients are only valuable if your willing to defend them</em>&#8221; and defending them takes money, a lot of money.  Did that company try to bully the entrepreneur out of the market with a lawsuit?  I think so, but surprise! the entrepreneur decided to pursue the lawsuit and drown themselves in legal fees because they, &#8220;<em>won&#8217;t be bullied</em>.&#8221;  My point is now both companies are spending valuable energy worrying about the lawsuit and not working on their products. &#8212; and further innovation.</p>
<p>After reading Brad&#8217;s post I would love to hear your comments&#8230;</p>
<p>********************************************</p>
<p><strong>Feed:</strong> Feld Thoughts<br />
<strong>Posted on:</strong> Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:26 PM<br />
<strong>Author:</strong> Brad Feld<br />
<strong>Subject:</strong> Do Patents Slow Down Innovation?</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.feld.com%2Fwp%2Farchives%2F2010%2F01%2Fdo-patents-slow-down-innovation.html"></a></p>
<p>I had a very interesting   meeting yesterday with an MIT Professor who I’ve known for a long time.    He is anti-software patent, as am I.  However, he suggested something I   hadn’t really spent much time thinking about, namely that <em>patents slow down innovation</em>.    Some very credible folks have been talking about this for a little while,   including James Bessen and Michael Meurer in their excellent book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691143218?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=feldwebsite-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0691143218">Patent   Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk</a>.</p>
<p>In my conversation   Friday, I heard a very interesting example.  Regularly, patent advocates   tell me how important patents are for the biotech and life science   industries.  However, there apparently is academic research in the works   that shows that patents actually slow down innovation in biotech.  The   specific example we discussed was that there is increasing evidence that when   a professor or company gets a patent in the field of genetics research, other   researchers simply stop doing work in that specific area.  As a result,   the number of researchers on a particular topic decreases, especially if the   patent is broad.  It’s not hard to theorize that this results in less   innovation around this area over time.</p>
<p>I’m just starting to read   some papers about this stuff, including those by <a href="http://fmurray.scripts.mit.edu/">MIT Professor Fiona Murray</a>.    If you are interested, Stuart Macdonald’s paper <em><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6V8J-4B1VP87-1&amp;_user=10&amp;_coverDate=03/31/2004&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=high&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_searchStrId=1186910533&amp;_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=80880d402b4fb8657573d12acae0cf9a">When   means become ends: considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation</a></em> frames the discussion nicely.  And Stephan Kinsella’s excellent essay <a href="http://mises.org/daily/4018"><em>Reducing   the Cost of IP Law</em></a><em> </em>absolutely   nails this.</p>
<p>I’m still obsessed with   my mission to “abolish software patents” especially after receiving yet   another email from a new startup that claims to be a “Patent Insurance   Company.”  A number of these have popped up recently in the past few   years, including several that are funded by VCs.  Their pitch is that   you pay them an annual fee, license any patents you have to them, and they   will “protect you” against any patent litigation.  Whenever I hear this   pitch, all I can think about is Al Capone walking the streets of Chicago   going door to door offering “protection” to all of the local businessmen if   they will pay his vig every week.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/%7Ea/Yux00CRDLG23rfN17vgJMZJqQZQ/0/da"></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/%7Ea/Yux00CRDLG23rfN17vgJMZJqQZQ/1/da"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/FeldThoughts?a=aknZwQJeG7s:39AINRqkSCQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/FeldThoughts?a=aknZwQJeG7s:39AINRqkSCQ:ZGknBuXYpFs"></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/FeldThoughts/%7E3/aknZwQJeG7s/do-patents-slow-down-innovation.html">View article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccwalters.com/2010/01/brad-felds-do-patents-slow-down-innovation-with-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

